Abstract. The article explores an innovative approach to engineering education through the integration of computer graphics aimed at bridging the gap between traditional teaching methods and the evolving technological design of the engineering profession. This highlights the limitations of traditional engineering graphics education, which often fails to prepare students for the complex, technology-based realities of engineering. Through the use of computer graphics, research offers a more engaging, dynamic, and effective learning environment that not only solves educational challenges, but also facilitates a smoother transition into the engineering workforce.
Keywords: engineering education, computer graphics, innovative pedagogical approach, spatial visualization, problems of a technologically complex professional environment, active learning, flipped classroom, CAD (computer-aided design), project-oriented education, blended learning, virtual reality, augmented reality, technology integration in education, professional training of students.
References:
1. Cortes, C. (2001). Using computer graphics in engineering education. *Journal of Engineering Education*, 90(4), 559-563.
2. Freeman S, Eddy CL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H and Wenderoth MP. (2014). Active learning improves student achievement in science, technology, and math. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, 111(23), 8410-8415.
3. Freud, JE and Oland, MV (2005). Integrating Engineering Education: A Literature Review. *Journal of Engineering Education*, 94(1), 147-164.
4. Graham, CR (2006). Mixed education systems. in CJ. _ Bonk and CR Graham (Ed.), *Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local projects* (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing House Edition .
5. Kolmos A. (1996). Reflections on project work and problem-based learning. *
6. Akçayir, M. and Akçayir, G. (2017). Benefits and Challenges of Augmented Reality for Education: A Systematic Literature Review. *Review of Educational Research*, 20, 1-11.
7. Dalgarno B. and Lee MJW (2010). What are the possibilities for learning in a 3D virtual environment? *British Journal of Educational Technology*, 41(1), 10-32.
8. Johnson, DV and Johnson, RT (2009). Educational psychology success stories: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. *Educational Researcher*, 38(5), 365-379.
9. Sorby, SA (2007). Development of 3D spatial visualization skills in engineering students . * Australasian Journal of Engineering Education*, 13(1), 1-11.
10. Dede, K. (2009). Immersive interfaces for interaction and learning. *Science*, 323(5910), 66-69.
11. Naps T. and others (2002). Exploring the role of visualization and participation in computer science learning. * Bulletin of the ACM SIGCSE *, 35(2), 131–152.
12. Me and Toyana , Murphy (2009).
13. Martin-Gutierrez, Fabiani, Benesova, Meneses, and Mohr (2015).
14. Lage , Platt and Treglia , (2000)
15. Prince , (2004)
16. Mills and Treghast , (2003)
SCIENCE & INNOVATION