FEATURES OF FORMATION AND FUNCTIONING OF ABBREVIATIONS IN RUSSIAN, UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES
28.03.2024
International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series C. Volume 3 Issue 3
Avyasova Irina Rafailovna
Abstract. The article examines the process of formation of abbreviations of military terminology, their morphological structure and the specifics of use in various language contexts. The features of the formation and functioning of military abbreviations in the Russian and Uzbek languages are analyzed, as well as their comparison with the English language. Particular attention is paid to the similarities and differences in the formation and use of abbreviations between these languages, as well as their role in linguistic communication, especially in the context of military affairs. The results of the study may be useful for linguists, translators and anyone interested in linguistic dynamics and interlingual aspects of communication, especially in the military sphere.
Keywords: abbreviation, military terminology, Russian language, Uzbek language, English language, formation of abbreviations, functioning of abbreviations, specialized vocabulary.
References:
1. Akhtambaev R.P. Features of speech culture in the work of military translators // Bulletin of Tomsk State University. – Tomsk, 2014. - No. 1 (13). – P.5-9.
2. Avyasova I. Structural and semantic features of abbreviations. Current research journal of philological sciences, 3(10), 2022. p.59-66.
3. Avyasova Irina. (2022). Specific Features of Using Abbreviation in English Military Discourse. Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History, 13, 22–26. Retrieved from https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjpch/article/view/3022
4. Avyasova Irina. (2023). The Specificity of the functioning and translation of abbreviations in the English Military Discourse. World Bulletin of Social Sciences, 20, 81-85. Retrieved from https://www.scholarexpress.net/index.php/wbss/article/view/2356
5. Bankevich V.V. On the question of the relationship between lexico-semantic and thematic groups // Semantics of words and sentences. - St. Petersburg, 2005. - With. 113-115.
6. Boyko M.G. Structural and semantic features of the formation of armored terminology in the English language: Abstract of thesis...cand.phil. Sci. – Omsk: OSU, 2011. – 24 p.
7. Ergasheva F.I. On the problem of abbreviation of English military vocabulary // Teaching of language and literature. – Tashkent, 2010, - No. 6. – P. 23-32.
8. Ergasheva F.I. Methods of formation of English military terms // Teaching of language and literature. – Tashkent, 2010. - No. 8. – P. 36-44.
9. Irina Rafailovna Avyasova. (2023). Methods of translating English military abbreviations and acronyms into Russian and Uzbek languages. Conferencea, 45–47. Retrieved from https://www.conferencea.org/index.php/conferences/article/view/2551
10. Korovushkin, V.P. A short educational English-Russian and Russian-English minimum dictionary of American military jargon: V.P. Korovushkin. - Cherepovets, 1980. - 86 p.
11. Kurganov A. Military vocabulary in Turkic studies // Ilmiy munozara: muammo, echim va yutuk. - T.; 2019. – pp. 103-104.
12. Marchand H. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. – Munchen: Ludicium, 1999. – 484 p.
13. Shermukhamedov Y., Umarov A. Russian-Uzbek dictionary of military terms. – T.: Fan, 1980. – 294 p.
1. 14.Sudzilovsky, G.A. Slang - what is it? English-Russian dictionary of military slang: G.A. Sudzilovsky. - M. : Military Publishing House, 1973. - 182 p.
14. Tatarinov V.A. General terminology. – M: Russian Philological Bulletin, 2006. – 526 p.
15. Wright S.E., Bading G.A. Handbook of Terminology Management. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2001. – 549p.
SCIENCE & INNOVATION