METHODOLOGY OF USING INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING THE SCIENCE OF EDUCATION IN THE PROCESS OF PRIMARY EDUCATION

Musayeva Lobar Sobirjon kizi

doi:10.5281/zenodo.10601133

Musayeva Lobar Sobirjon kizi

Abstract. This article explores the methodology of using interactive technologies in the teaching of educational science in primary education. Interactive technologies offer a wide range of tools and resources that can enhance student engagement, promote active learning, and support personalized instruction. The article discusses various aspects of incorporating interactive technologies, including differentiated instruction, real-world connections, multimedia production, data analysis and visualization, formative assessment, digital citizenship, and professional development. It highlights the benefits of blended learning, virtual reality, online discussion forums, gamified learning, and authentic assessments. The article emphasizes the importance of accessibility, ongoing support, and ethical considerations when integrating interactive technologies in the classroom. By following this methodology, teachers can create engaging and effective learning experiences that foster critical thinking, collaboration, creativity, and digital literacy skills in primary education students

Keywords: interactive technologies, educational science, primary education, methodology, differentiated instruction, real-world connections, multimedia production, data analysis and visualization, formative assessment, digital citizenship, professional development, blended learning, virtual reality, online discussion forums, gamified learning, authentic assessments, accessibility, ongoing support, ethical considerations

References:

1. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2). 2. Dede, C. (2009). Comparing frameworks for 21st-century skills. 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn. 3. Karsenti, T., & Bugmann, J. (2017). The impact of interactive whiteboard use on student achievement. Computers & Education, 114, 27-39. 4. Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (2009). Technology and student learning: Towards a learner-centered teaching model. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 77-86. 5. Louw, M., & Du Toit, A. (2015). Interactive whiteboards as a tool for effective teaching and learning in the South African classroom: Fact or fallacy? South African Journal of Education, 35(2), 1-11. 6. Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, D. J., & Moorthy, S. (2011). Preparing teachers to create a mainstream-oriented ambitious instructional vision for English learners in science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 48(8), 898-916. 7. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 145-168. 8. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research, 221-247. 9. So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem-based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116. 10. Song, Y. (2019). The impact of interactive technologies on student engagement and learning: A literature review. Computers & Education, 142, 103647.