A PRACTICAL OUTLOOK OF ANALYZING LANGUAGE LEARNING PROCESS OF TEENAGERS’ LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND ITS CORRELATION WITH TEACHING PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT
31.01.2024
International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series B. Volume 3 Issue 1
Fakhriddinova Tumaris Fakhriddin kizi
Abstract. This article highlights the importance of considering learners' linguistic backgrounds, learning methods, personality traits, and motivations in language instruction. By recognizing the unique characteristics of late teenagers, educators can tailor their teaching approaches to maximize language learning outcomes. Furthermore, this comparative analysis contributes to the broader understanding of language acquisition during the late critical period and its implications for language education.
Keywords: language learning, critical period, learner profiles, background, personality, motivation, methods, approaches, proficiency, strategies, affective filter, authentic materials, processing instruction, critical thinking, feedback
References:
1. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2021). Investment and motivation in language learning: What's the difference? Language Teaching, 1-12. doi:10.1017/S0261444821000057
2. Dörnyei, Z. (1998) Motivation in Second and Foreign Language Learning. Language Teaching, 31, 117–135 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001315X
3. García, O. (2011). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
4. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman Group UK Ltd.
5. Long, M. H. (1983). Does Second Language Instruction Make a Difference? A Review of Research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3).
6. Muñoz, C. (2019). A new look at "age": Young and old L2 learners. In Schwieter, J. W., & Benati, A. (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 430-450). Cambridge University Press.
7. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158 pp.
8. VanPatten, B. (1993). Processing instruction: An update. The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 45-57 pp.