THE EFFECT OF FRAME-BY-FRAME MONITORING OF EMBRYOS ON OBSTETRIC AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN SINGLETON PREGNANCY IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS

Suraya Zarifovna Yuldasheva; Yulduz Gulyamovna Rasul-Zade

doi:10.5281/zenodo.10206089

THE EFFECT OF FRAME-BY-FRAME MONITORING OF EMBRYOS ON OBSTETRIC AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES IN SINGLETON PREGNANCY IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS

25.11.2023 International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series D. Volume 2 Issue 11

Suraya Zarifovna Yuldasheva, Yulduz Gulyamovna Rasul-Zade

Abstract. The process of morphological examination of embryos is one of the most important selection methods, according to the results of which an assessment is made of a whole group of indicators, such as the number of blastomeres, the proportion of fragmentation, the severity of compactification, size and shape, as well as their correspondence to the stage of development, the formation of the blastocyst, the size of its cavity, the state of the internal cell mass with trophoblast. An effective method of embryo selection is currently in high demand in this field, since it is a method of selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential. When analyzing many retrospective and prospective studies, the advantage and absence of differences in comparison with the traditional morphological assessment of embryo quality are emphasized, Almost all publications devoted to time-lapse microscopy focused on determining the time of specific events of embryo division and subsequent use of this information to create algorithms to help select an embryo for transfer, but there is insufficient data on obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies, infertility, elective blastocyst transfer, time-lapse microscopy.

References:

1. Иванова О.В., Шурыгина О.В., Русаков Д.Ю. Быкова Т.В., Петрова А.А., Юхимец С.Н., Кулакова О.В., Юлдашева С.З. Оценка эффективности криоконсервация гамет и эмбрионов человека в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Морфологические ведомости. 2019;27(3):46-50. 2. Armstrong S, Bhide P, Jordan V, Pacey A, Marjoribanks J, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;Cd011320. 3. Bortoletto P, Bakkensen J, Anchan RM. Embryo transfer: timing and techniques. Minerva Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;43(1):57-68. 4. Brison DR, Roberts SA, Kimber SJ. How should we assess the safety of IVF technologies? Reprod Biomed Online 2013;27:710-721. 5. Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, Novara PV, Lain M, De Ponti E, Turchi D, Fadini R, Dal CM. Focused time-lapse analysis reveals novel aspects of human fertilization and suggests new parameters of embryo viability. Hum Reprod 2018;33:23-31. 6. Chen M, Wei S, Hu J, Yuan J, Liu F. Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2017;12:e0178720. 7. De los Santos MJ, Apter S, Coticchio G, Debrock S, Lundin K, Plancha CE, Prados F, Rienzi L, Verheyen G. Woodward B et al. revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum Reprod 2016;31:685-686. 8. Harper J, Jackson E, Sermon K, Aitken RJ, Harbottle S, Mocanu E, Hardarson T, Mathur R, Viville S, Vail A et al. . Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for ‘add-on’ interventions? Hum Reprod 2017;32:485-491. 9. Kragh MF, Karstoft H. Embryo selection with artificial intelligence: how to evaluate and compare methods? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jul;38(7):1675-1689. 10. Lasiene K, Lasys V, Vitkus A, Sederevicius A. Zmogaus ir gyvūnu embrionu kokybes ivertinimas (metodu apzvalga) [Evaluation of the human and animal embryos' quality (Review of methods)]. Medicina (Kaunas). 2005;41(5):367-74. 11. Murphy NM, Samarasekera TS, Macaskill L, Mullen J, Rombauts LJF. Genome sequencing of human in vitro fertilisation embryos for pathogenic variation screening. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 2;10(1):3795. 12. Nakahara T, Iwase A, Goto M, Harata T, Suzuki M, Ienaga M, Kobayashi H, Takikawa S, Manabe S, Kikkawa F, Ando H. Evaluation of the safety of time-lapse observations for human embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010 Feb;27(2-3):93-6. 13. Polanski LT, Coelho Neto MA, Nastri CO, Navarro PA, Ferriani RA, Raine-Fenning N, Martins WP. Time-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:394-401. 14. Rocafort E, Enciso M, Leza A, Sarasa J, Aizpurua J. Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018. 15. Rocha JC, Passalia F, Matos FD, Maserati MP Jr, Alves MF, Almeida TG, Cardoso BL, Basso AC, Nogueira MF. Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard? JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016 Aug 1;20(3):150-8. 16. Reignier A, Lammers J, Barriere P, Freour T. Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2018;36:380-387. 17. Strouthopoulos C, Anifandis G. An automated blastomere identification method for the evaluation of day 2 embryos during IVF/ICSI treatments. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Mar;156:53-59. 18. Takakuwa T. 3D Analysis of Human Embryos and Fetuses Using Digitized Datasets From the Kyoto Collection. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2018 Jun;301(6):960-969. 19. Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Fertil Steril 2017;108:722-729. 20. Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z. Artificial intelligence in human in vitro fertilization and embryology. Fertil Steril. 2020 Nov;114(5):914-920.