ALGORITHMS AND SOFTWARE FOR GENERATING DYNAMIC REPORTING IN AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Kurbanbaev Azamat Ikhtiyorovich

doi:10.5281/zenodo.10102487

ALGORITHMS AND SOFTWARE FOR GENERATING DYNAMIC REPORTING IN AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

10.11.2023 International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series B. Volume 2 Issue 11

Kurbanbaev Azamat Ikhtiyorovich

Abstract. Consideration of the issue that the implemented electronic document management system will satisfy absolutely all the requirements of the enterprise only if the system is properly integrated into business processes company and taking into account the peculiarities of internal corporate document flow. Therefore, for the full functioning of electronic document management systems, support and adaptation are required by the company implementing this or that system. The development of methods for integrating information resources is one of the most pressing problems in the field of information systems. It has begun to attract especially great attention in recent years due to the high heterogeneity of information data sources. The presence of various types of electronic documents makes the electronic document management system (EDMS) a highly heterogeneous information system.

Keywords: programming, document processing, system, algorithmic, engineering

References:

1. Electronic document management systems [Electronic resource]. https://www.sites.google.com/site/upravlenieznaniami/tehnologii-upravlenia-znaniami/sistemyelektronnogo-dokumentooborota (accessed November 15, 2020) 2. DirectumRX in BP Russia: a unified information space for managing tasks and documents [Electronic resource]. Russia, 2018. Access mode: URL: https://www.osp.ru/resources/releases/?rid=38328 (access date: November 14. 3. Electronic document management system “E1 Euphrates”. Access mode: URL: https://evfrat.ru/ (access date 11/17/2020) 4. Requirements for the electronic document management system. Access mode: URL: https://www.atlassoft.ru/articles/trebovaniya-k-sisteme-elektronnogo-dokumentooborota (access date 11/13/2020) 5. Electronic document management system “DockVision”. Access mode: URL: https://docsvision.com/ (access date 11/18/2020) 6. Sabou Marta. Learning WEb Service Ontologies: an Automatic Extraction Method and its evaluation. //URL: http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/marta/ 7. Fraunhofer Institute Fokus http://www.sweb-project.org. 8. Sibley E.H., Taylor R.W. A data definition and mapping language. Comm. Of the ACM, v. 16, 1973, pp.750-759. 9. Sibley E.H., W.T. Hardgrave, Kogalovsky M.R., Makalsky K.I. A conceptual model to support multi-model external views. Proc. of the Joint U.S.-U.S.S.R. Seminar «Data Models and Database Systems». Austin, Texas. Texas University, 1979, pp. 146-187. 10. Smith K. Michael, Welty Chris, McGuinness L.Deborah. OWL Web Ontology Language. Guide. //URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ 11. Swartz A. The Semantic Web In Breadth // URL: http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long 12. Thieme C., Siebes A. Scheme Integration in the Object-Oriented Databases. CAiSE 1993, pp. 5470. 13. Tobies S. Complexity Results and Practical Algorithms for Logics in Knowledge Represen-tation: Ph.D. Dissertation. Aachen, Germany, 2002. 14. Ullman J. D. Information Integration Using Logical Views // Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT'97): Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin. Germany: Springer, 1997. Vol. 1186. P. 19-40. 15. Vacura M., Svatek V., Smrz P. A Pattern-Based Framework for Uncertainty Representation in OntologiesText, Speech and Dialogue. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference TSD 2008, Brno, Czech Republic, September 8-12, 2008. / Eds. P. Sojka, A. Horak et al. LNAI 5246. Springer-Verlag, 2008. 16. Van Heijst, G., Schreiber, A. T., and Wielinga, B. J. 1996. Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development. //URL: http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/ 17. Wen-Syan Li, Chris Clifton. Semantic Integration in Heterogeneous Databases Using Neural Networks. Int. Conf. on VLDB, 1994, pp. 1-12. 18. Wiederhold G. Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems. IEEE Computer 25:3, pp. 38-49, 1992. 19. Wielinga, B. J. and Schreiber, A. T. Reusable and sharable knowledge bases: a European perspective // Proceedings of First International Conference on Building and Sharing of Very Large-Scaled Knowledge Bases. Tokyo, Japan Information Processing Development Center. 1993 20. XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language. W3C Working Draft, 15 November, 2002.