EFFECTS OF COPPER OXIDE AND SULFURIC ACID ON THE PYROLYSIS BEHAVIOR OF AMMONIUM NITRATE UNDER THERMAL RADIATION EXPERIMENTS

Asadjon Qambarov; Tursunoy Navruzova; Mukhlisa Davlatmirzaeva; Iskandar  To‘raboyev, Zarifjon Salimov

doi:10.5281/zenodo.7979264

EFFECTS OF COPPER OXIDE AND SULFURIC ACID ON THE PYROLYSIS BEHAVIOR OF AMMONIUM NITRATE UNDER THERMAL RADIATION EXPERIMENTS

28.05.2023 International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series A. Volume 2 Issue 5

Asadjon Qambarov, Tursunoy Navruzova, Mukhlisa Davlatmirzaeva, Iskandar To‘raboyev, Zarifjon Salimov

Abstract. Statistics have indicated that industrial accidents of ammonium nitrate were primarily caused by uncontrolled external fires where heating was dominantly controlled by radiation, and yet existing studies at milligram scale cannot fully simulate the real fire scenarios. To explore the pyrolysis behavior in typical fires, this study conducted thermal radiation experiments using pure ammonium nitrate, and its mixtures with copper oxide and sulfuric acid. Different from the pyrolysis process identified in milligram scale tests, the bench-scale pyrolysis of ammonium nitrate under radiation consisted of four stages. Pyrolysis structure model of each stage was built to reveal the differences in dominated thermal behavior. Results indicated that two additives had different thermochemical effects on pyrolysis of ammonium nitrate. Sulfuric acid accelerated the reaction rate of each stage by generating catalytic nitric acid; copper oxide reduced the number of reaction stages into three via surface absorptions. The time and mass loss rate of different stages were determined. Recommendations on effective emergency response were made to prevent the transition of slow decomposition into fast decomposition, and thus to intervene the fire-induced domino effect of ammonium nitrate. This study helps to understand the pyrolysis behavior of ammonium nitrate under fire exposure, and provides insights for pyrolysis modeling and firefighting in industry of interest.

Keywords: ammonium nitrate, thermal radiation, mass loss rate, pyrolysis behavior, emergency response

References:

1. V. Babrauskas, D. Leggett, Thermal decomposition of ammonium nitrate, Fire Mater. 44 (2020) 250–268. https://doi:10.1002/fam.2797. 2. X. Baraza, A. Pey, J. Gim´enez, The self-sustaining decomposition of ammonium nitrate fertiliser: Case study, Escombreras valley, Spain, J. Hazard. Mater. 387 (2020), 121674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121674. 3. J. Jos, S. Mathew, Ammonium Nitrate as an Eco-Friendly Oxidizer for Composite Solid Propellants: Promises and Challenges, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 42 (2017) 470–498. https://doi:10.1080/10408436.2016.1244642. 4. C. Oommen, S.R. Jain, Ammonium nitrate: a promising rocket propellant oxidizer, J. Hazard. Mater. 67 (1999) 253–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99) 00039-4. 5. G. Marlair, M.-A.A. Kordek, Safety and security issues relating to low capacity storage of AN-based fertilizers, J. Hazard. Mater. 123 (2005) 13–28. https://doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.028. 6. S. Chaturvedi, P.N. Dave, Review on Thermal Decomposition of Ammonium Nitrate, J. Energ. Mater. 31 (2013) 1–26. https://doi:10.1080/07370652.20 11.573523. 7. M. Yang, X. Chen, Y. Wang, B. Yuan, Y. Niu, Y. Zhang, R. Liao, Z. Zhang, Comparative evaluation of thermal decomposition behavior and thermal stability of powdered ammonium nitrate under different atmosphere conditions, J. Hazard. Mater. 337 (2017) 10–19. https://doi:10.1016/j. jhazmat.2017.04.063. 8. J.C. Oxley, J.L. Smith, E. Rogers, M. Yu, Ammonium nitrate: thermal stability and explosivity modifiers, Thermochim. Acta. 384 (2002) 23–45, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00775-4. 9. R. Gunawan, D. Zhang, Thermal stability and kinetics of decomposition of ammonium nitrate in the presence of pyrite, J. Hazard. Mater. 165 (2009) 751–758. https://doi:10.1016/j. jhazmat.2008.10.054. 10. K. Fujisato, H. Habu, A. Miyake, K. Hori, Thermal decomposition of ammonium nitrate modeling of thermal dissociation in thermal analysis, Sci Technol Energ Mater. 75 (2014) 28–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.063. 11. V. P. Sinditskii, V.Y. Egorshev, A.I. Levshenkov, V. V. Serushkin, Ammonium nitrate: Combustion mechanism and the role of additives, in: Propellants, Explos. Pyrotech., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005: pp. 269–280. https://doi:10.1002/ prep.200500017. 12. Z. Han, S. Sachdeva, M.I. Papadaki, M.S. Mannan, Ammonium nitrate thermal decomposition with additives, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 35 (2015) 307–315. https://doi:10.1016/J.JLP.2014.10.011. 13. H.Q. Cao, Q.L. Duan, H. Chai, X.X. Li, J.H. Sun, Experimental study of the effect of typical halides on pyrolysis of ammonium nitrate using model reconstruction, J. Hazard. Mater. 384 (2020), 121297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhazmat.2019.121297. 14. H.Q. Cao, L. Jiang, Q.L. Duan, D. Zhang, H.D. Chen, J.H. Sun, An experimental and theoretical study of optimized selection and model reconstruction for ammonium nitrate pyrolysis, J. Hazard. Mater. 364 (2019) 539–547, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jhazmat.2018.10.048. 15. V. Babrauskas, Explosions of ammonium nitrate fertilizer in storage or transportation are preventable accidents, J. Hazard. Mater. 304 (2016) 134–149. https://doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.040. 16. Q. Chen, M. Wood, J. Zhao, Case study of the Tianjin accident: Application of barrier and systems analysis to understand challenges to industry loss prevention in emerging economies, Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 131 (2019) 178–188, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.028. 17. F. Gui, J. Wang, M. Yan, G. Fu, J. Wang, M. Yan, F. Gui, J. Wang, M. Yan, G. Fu, J. Wang, M. Yan, Anatomy of Tianjin Port fire and explosion: Process and causes, Process Saf. Prog. 35 (2016) 216–220. https://doi:10.1002/prs.11837. 18. L. Ding, J. Ji, F. Khan, Combining uncertainty reasoning and deterministic modeling for risk analysis of fire-induced domino effects, Saf. Sci. 129 (2020), 104802, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104802. 19. J. Ji, Q. Tong, F. Khan, M. Dadashzadeh, R. Abbassi, Risk-Based Domino Effect Analysis for Fire and Explosion Accidents Considering Uncertainty in Processing Facilities, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57 (2018) 3990–4006. doi:10.1021/acs. iecr.8b00103. 20. L. Ding, F. Khan, J. Ji, A novel approach for domino effects modeling and risk analysis based on synergistic effect and accident evidence, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 203 (2020), 107109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107109. 21. Q. Sun, L. Jiang, M. Li, J. Sun, Assessment on thermal hazards of reactive chemicals in industry: State of the Art and perspectives, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 78 (2020), 100832, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100832. 22. Z. Han, H.J. Pasman, M.S. Mannan, Extinguishing fires involving ammonium nitrate stock with water: Possible complications, J. Fire Sci. 35 (2017) 457–483, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734904117735264. 23. J. Sun, Z. Sun, Q. Wang, H. Ding, T. Wang, C. Jiang, Catalytic effects of inorganic acids on the decomposition of ammonium nitrate, J. Hazard. Mater. 127 (2005) 204–210. https://doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.028. 24. Z. Xu, G. Xu, X. Fu, Q. Wang, The mechanism of nano-CuO and CuFe2o4 catalyzed thermal decomposition of ammonium nitrate, Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 6 (2016) 184798041668169. https://doi:10.1177/1847980416681699. 25. A.A. Vargeese, K. Muralidharan, Kinetics and mechanism of hydrothermally prepared copper oxide nanorod catalyzed decomposition of ammonium nitrate, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 447–448 (2012) 171–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. apcata.2012.09.027. 26. K. Kajiyama, Y. Izato, A. Miyake, Thermal characteristics of ammonium nitrate, carbon, and copper(II) oxide mixtures, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 113 (2013) 1475–1480. https://doi:10.1007/s10973-013-3201-5. 27. B. Schartel, M. Bartholmai, U. Knoll, Some comments on the use of cone calorimeter data, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 88 (2005) 540–547, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.016. 28. I.S.O. 5660-1, Reaction-to-fire tests-Heat release, smoke production and mass loss rate-Part 1: heat release rate (cone calorimeter method), Geneva, Switz. Int. Stand. Organ. (2002). 29. H.S. Ding, H. Jiang, Self-heating co-pyrolysis of excessive activated sludge with waste biomass: Energy balance and sludge reduction, Bioresour. Technol. 133 (2013) 16–22. https://doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.090. 30. R. Emberley, T. Do, J. Yim, J.L. Torero, Critical heat flux and mass loss rate for extinction of flaming combustion of timber, Fire Saf. J. 91 (2017) 252–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.008. 31. O. Grexa, H. Lübke, Flammability parameters of wood tested on a cone calorimeter, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 74 (2001) 427–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910 (01)00181-1. 32. Y. Ding, S.I. Stoliarov, R.H. Kraemer, Pyrolysis model development for a polymeric material containing multiple flame retardants: Relationship between heat release rate and material composition, Combust. Flame. 202 (2019) 43–57, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.01.003. 33. M.B. McKinnon, Y. Ding, S.I. Stoliarov, S. Crowley, R.E. Lyon, Pyrolysis model for a carbon fiber/epoxy structural aerospace composite, J. Fire Sci. 35 (2017) 36–61. https://doi:10.1177/0734904116679422. 34. B.T. Rhodes, J.G. Quintiere, Burning rate and flame heat flux for PMMA in a cone calorimeter, Fire Saf. J. 26 (1996) 221–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112 (96)00025-2. 35. B. Li, A study of thermal degradation and decomposition of rigid poly (vinyl chloride) with metal oxides using thermogravimetry and cone calorimetry, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 68 (2000) 197–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(00) 00002-1. 36. J. Luche, T. Rogaume, F. Richard, E. Guillaume, Characterization of thermal properties and analysis of combustion behavior of PMMA in a cone calorimeter, Fire Saf. J. 46 (2011) 451–461, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.07.005. 37. V. Babrauskas, The cone calorimeter, in: SFPE Handb. Fire Prot. Eng., Springer, 2016: pp. 952–980. 38. G. Wypych, Testing Methods in Filled Systems, in: Handbook of Fillers (Fourth Edition), Elsevier, 2016: pp. 627–664. doi:10.1016/B978-1-895198-91-1.50016-6. 39. J.E.J. Staggs, Savitzky-Golay smoothing and numerical differentiation of cone calorimeter mass data, Fire Saf. J. 40 (2005) 493–505, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. firesaf.2005.05.002. 40. Y.I. Izato, A. Miyake, S. Date, Combustion characteristics of ammonium nitrate and carbon mixtures based on a thermal decomposition mechanism, Propellants, Explos. Pyrotech. 38 (2013) 129–135. https://doi:10.1002/prep.201100106. 41. K.R. Brower, J.C. Oxley, M. Tewari, Evidence for homolytic decomposition of ammonium nitrate at high temperature, J. Phys. Chem. 93 (1989) 4029–4033, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100347a033. 42. A. Miyake, Y. Izato, Thermal Decomposition Behaviors of Ammonium Nitrate and Carbon Mixtures, Int. J. Energ. Mater. Chem. Propuls. 9 (2010) 523–531. https: 43. //doi:10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2011001429. 44. Y. Wada, K. Hori, M. Arai, Combustion mechanism of mixtures of guanidine nitrate, ammonium nitrate, and basic copper nitrate, Sci Technol Energ Mater. 71 (2010) 83–87. 45. Y. Izato, A. Miyake, Thermal decomposition of molten ammonium nitrate (AN), J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 122 (2015) 595–600. https://doi:10.1007/s10973-0 15-476