MONITORING TEACHERS’ ACTIVITY: ASSESSING EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH

Nozima Makhamadjanova

doi:10.5281/zenodo.7818595

Nozima Makhamadjanova

Abstract. This article examines the role of vice-principals in monitoring teachers’ activity, focusing on the effectiveness and implications of such monitoring for professional growth and school culture. The literature review reveals various perspectives on the benefits and drawbacks of this monitoring process, and the subsequent sections discuss the importance of regular feedback, potential biases, and the impact on teacher autonomy and student outcomes. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to monitoring teachers’ activities that fosters a supportive environment and promotes professional development.

Keywords: monitoring, teachers’ activity, assessing effectiveness, professional growth, students’ outcomes, digital software

References:

1. Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55(6), 735-752. 2. Cosh, J. (1998). Peer observation in higher education: A reflective approach. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35(2), 171-176. 3. Downey, C. J., Steffy, B. E., & Poston, W. K. (2009). The three-minute classroom walkthrough: Changing school supervisory practice one teacher at a time. Corwin Press. 4. DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11. 5. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. 6. Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. 7. Johnson, M., & Williams, K. (2020). Teacher surveillance and the impact on professional autonomy: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Policy, 35(4), 567-585. 8. Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Corwin Press 9. Leana, C. R. (2011). The missing link in school reform. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(4), 30-35. 10. Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2021). The role of digital monitoring in enhancing teacher performance and professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 375-392. 11. Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22-42.