THE INFLUENCE OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL FACTORS IN THE TRANSITION TO UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY

Alisher Khasanov

doi:10.5281/zenodo.7767968

Alisher Khasanov

Abstract. The article examines the concept of university autonomy and its development is developed Western and Asian countries, including the prerequisites for the development of autonomy, as well as the components of autonomy, which include various areas of university activity. The history of the development of universities, historical factors and culture of government administration of public universities in Uzbekistan and the difficulties of transition to a decentralized system of university governance are considered.

Keywords: university autonomy, academic freedom, university governance

References:

1. Bossert, T. J., & Beauvais, J. C. (2002). Decentralization of health systems in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and the Philippines: a comparative analysis of decision space. Health policy and planning, 17(1), 14-31. 2. Holmén, J. (2022). The autonomy of higher education in Finland and Sweden: global management trends meet national political culture and governance models. Comparative Education, 58(2), 147-163. 3. Ismailov, A. (2021). The Possibility Of Establishing The Academy Of Sciences In Uzbekistan. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(9), 222-230. 4. Kandakharov, A. (2017). The Education System Of The 16th Century Bukhara Khanate. Himalayan and Central Asian Studies, 21(4), 53. 5. Kohtamäki, V., & Balbachevsky, E. (2019). An explorative study of the consequences of university autonomy in Finland and Brazil. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(3), 328-342. 6. Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied linguistics, 20(1), 71-94. 7. Perkin,H.(2007).History of universities.International handbook of higher education,159-205. 8. Yang, R. (2020). Political culture and higher education governance in Chinese societies: Some reflections. Frontiers of Education in China, 15, 187-221.