References:
1. Dikaya L.G., Zankovsky A.N. (ed.) Psychological problems of professional activity. M.: Nauka, 1991. - 166p.
2. Zaikov D.E. "Legal psychology", Training minimum - Moscow: Jurisprudence, 2008 - 24 p.
3. Mahmudova H.T. Owners of spatial imagination. Criterion of fairness. Scientific-practical, legal magazine. - T., No. 10, 2022. B. 8-10.
4. Cleandrov M.I. Status of a judge. Tutorial. - Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Publishing Company of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2000. - 444 p
5. Zaikov D.E. "Legal psychology", Training minimum - Moscow: Jurisprudence, 2008 - 24 p.
6. Alieskerov M.A., Engalychev V.F. On the psychological support of the activities of the courts // Russian judge, No. 5, 2004. - P. 11-12.
7. Makhmudova, K. (2023). THE ROLE OF THE PSYCHOLOGIST IN COMPLEX FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC EXPERTISE. Science and innovation, 2(B2), 100-106.
8. Tilabovna, M. K. (2021). Actual problems in the expert competence of a psychologist in civil proceedings of the Republic of Uzbekistan (on the example of psychological and psychiatric examinations). ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(3), 1379-1384.
9. Makhmudova, K. (2023). SIGNIFICANCE OF JUDICIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF DEALABILITY IN UZBEKISTAN. Science and innovation, 2(C1), 13-16.
10. Tilabovna, M. K. (2021). Current opportunities of forensic-psychological expertise in solving the question of will. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(5), 881-887.