PROBLEMS OF PRAGMATIC LEARNING OF GRAMMATICAL FORMS
20.02.2023
International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series B. Volume 2 Issue 2
Rakhmatullayeva Shakhodat Ziyotovna
Abstract. This article focuses on the issues of pragmatic study of grammatical forms. The opinions of American scientists Ch. Pierce and Ch. Morris about pragmatics are analyzed. When a person engages in speech communication, in which society, in what environment and in what situation this communication takes place, each period and environment has its own rules of communication. It is shown that the rules of selection and use of language units and the conditions of communication are the basis for determining the form of speech.
It has been determined that the role and place of grammatical possibilities in speech cannot be imagined, thought and interpreted without pragmatic factors. It is under analysis that the level of research of linguistic units and the linguistic relations between them requires the examination of their speech reality in this regard.
Keywords: grammar, pragmatics, substantive, pragmatic approach, discourse, linguistic unit, linguistic attitude
References:
1. Mengliyev B. The commonality of possibility and reality in language // "Marifat" newspaper, May 13, 2015.
2. Mengliev B.R. Language as a whole system. - Tashkent: Nihol, 2010. - 28 p.
3. Mengliyev B., Ernazarova M. Interpretation of grammatical meaning in a systematic approach // Current issues of Uzbek linguistics. - Tashkent: TSPU named after Nizami, 2011. - 54 p.
4. Mominov S.M. Socio-linguistic features of Uzbek communication behavior. Philol. science. doc. ... diss. autoref. - Tashkent: 2000. - 20 p.
5. Formanovskaya N.I. Speech etiquette and communication culture. - Moscow: Higher School, 1989. - 159 p.
6. Kagan M.S. The world of communication. - Moscow: Politizdat, 1988. - 319 p.
7. Toirova G.I. Systematicity and informativeness in Uzbek speech communication. Doctor of Philology (RhD) ...diss. - Tashkent: 2017. - 157 p.
8. Rakhmatullaeva Sh. Z. The role of ethnic factors in the implementation of grammatical meanings of the forms of the mode of action // Journal of scientific publications of graduate students and doctoral students. – 2016. – no. 6. - p. 61-63.
9. Bazarova D.B. Variability of phraseological units. Science and innovation. 1 (B7), 483-486.
10. Рахматуллаева, Ш. З. (2013). ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ ГРАММАТИЧЕСКИХ ЗНАЧЕНИЙ ФОРМ ОБРАЗА ДЕЙСТВИЯ В ПИСЬМЕННЫХ ПАМЯТНИКАХ. SCIENCE AND WORLD, 31.
11. Рахматуллаева, Ш. З. (2016). РОЛЬ ЭТНИЧЕСКИХ ФАКТОРОВ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ ГРАММАТИЧЕСКИХ ЗНАЧЕНИЙ ФОРМ СПОСОБА ДЕЙСТВИЯ. Журнал научных публикаций аспирантов и докторантов, (6), 61-63.
12. Рахматуллаева, Ш. З. (2013). О НАЦИОНАЛЬНО-КУЛЬТУРНОЙ ЗНАЧИМОСТИ ФОРМ ОБРАЗА ДЕЙСТВИЯ В УЗБЕКСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ. Theoretical & Applied Science, (6), 139-143.
13. Bozorova, D. B. (2015). Some notes of variability in the Uzbek linguistics. Theoretical & Applied Science, (4), 135-138
![](images/google_scholar.png)
![](images/cyberleninka_logo.png)