METHODS FOR EVALUATING THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE RESULTS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF ANALYTICAL VALUES
28.01.2023
International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series A. Volume 2 Issue 1
Masharipov Shodlik Masharipovich, Rakhmatullaev Sarvar Anvarovich, Fattoev Firuz Farkhod ogli
Abstract. Methods of estimating uncertainty of results of direct and indirect measurements of analytical values have been analysed. Analytical expressions for numerical calculation of main sources of physical and chemical values are given. Significant sources of measurement uncertainty have been simulated. The apparatus effects may include, for example, mistake limits of the analytical weights; The presence of a temperature regulator that can maintain an average temperature that differs (within specified limits) from the temperature recorded; Automatic analyzer, which can be subject to overload effects. Taking into account these specifics of analytical measurements, calculations of standardized standard uncertainties of measurement results according to GOST 1770 have been performed.
Keywords: Coverage factor, coverage probability, coverage interval, type A uncertainty, type B uncertainty, extended uncertainty, measurements, measured value, analytical values, direct measurements, indirect measurements, correlated value, uncorrelated value.
References:
1. JCGM 100:2008 (GUM 1995 with minor corrections). Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement
2. JCGM 101:2008 Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method
3. JCGM 102:2011 Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 2 to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" – Extension to any number of output quantities
4. JCGM 104:2009 Evaluation of measurement data – An introduction to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" and related documents
5. JCGM 106:2012 Evaluation of measurement data – The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment
6. Masharipov SH.M., Miralieva A.K., Fattoyev F.F., Rahmatullaev S.Ð. Development of the method of calculation of uncertainty of measurement results and evaluation of accurate characteristics in the field of analytical measurements// European Sciences review. Scientific journal (Austria, Vienna). ̶ â„– 9 ̶ 10.-2019 (September–October) .P.39-41.
7. Ш.Ðœ.Машарипов. Ðовый подход и его обоÑнование при оценке неопределенноÑти результатов измерений по типу Ð // Программно-техничеÑкое обеÑпечение автоматизированных ÑиÑтем [Ðлектронный реÑурÑ] : материалы вÑероÑÑийÑкой молодежной научно-практичеÑкой конференции (22 ноÑÐ±Ñ€Ñ 2019 г., Барнаул) / Под ред. Ð. Г.Якунина. – Ðлектрон. текÑтовые дан. (1 файл: 4,05 МБ). – Барнаул : Изд-во ÐлтГТУ, 2019.С.3-6 – Режим доÑтупа : https://journal.altstu.ru/konf_2019/2020_1/30/
8. Masharipov SH.M., Fattoyev F.F. Development and research of the influence on accuracy of the main sources of uncertainty in the measurement of humidity and other physicochemical measured values. International journal of advanced research in science, engineering and technology (IJARSET), Volume 7, Issue 1, January, 2020, pp.12362-12369. //Internet access: http://www.ijarset.com/upload/2020/january/3-Shodik240819-02.pdf
9. www.bipm.org
10. www.iso.org
![](images/google_scholar.png)
![](images/cyberleninka_logo.png)