IMPORTANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES IN MEDICINE
18.11.2022
International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series D. Volume 1 Issue 8
Abstract. An analytic paper discusses current understanding of the status and the role of fundamental and applied research and specifically of medical sci- ence for the socio-economic development of society. The related concept of scientific development is presented; classification and definitions used by UNESCO and other international and national organizations of different countries
Keywords: fundamental, basic and applied science, medical science, innovation, social and economic development.
References:
What is basic research? National Science Foundation (NSF). Third Annual Report [Internet]. Retrieved 2014-05-31 [cited 2016 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1953/annualreports/ ar_1953_sec6.pdf
2. International Basic Sciences Programme: Harnessing coopera- tion for capacity building in science and the use of scientific knowledge. IBSP: What it is, what is it does. UNESCO Natu- ral Sciences Sector Division of Basic and Engineering Sciences. Issue 1. Paris; 2008. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ images/0016/001627/162712e.pdf
3. Дoклaд нaучнoгo coветa междунaрoднoй прoгрaммы пo фундaментaльным нaукaм. Aкты Генерaльнoй Кoнфе- ренции 36-й cеccии [интернет].
4. Eisenberg L. Science in medicine: Too much or too little and too limited in scope? Am J Med. 1988;84(3 Pt. 1):483–491. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90270-7.
5. Clarke JN, Arnold S, Everest M, et al. The paradoxical reliance on allopathic medicine and positivist science among skeptical audiences. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(1):164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.socs- cimed.2006.08.038.
6. Bayertz K, Nevers P. Biology as technology. Clio Med. 1998;48:108–132.
7. Pickstone JV, Worboys M. Focus: Between and beyond «Histories of science» and «Histories of medicine». Isis. 2011;102(1):97–101. doi: 10.1086/658658.
8. King LS. Medicine in the USA: Historical vignettes: XI: Medi- cine seeks to be ‘scientific. 'JAMA. 1983;249(18):2475–2479. doi: 10.1001/jama.249.18.2475.
9. Marshall T. Scientific knowledge in medicine: A new clinical episte- mology? J Eval Clin Pract. 1997;3(2):133–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2753.1997.00075
SCIENCE & INNOVATION