ANALYSIS OF STUDY OF INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS OF THE COMPLETE GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAM

Z.Saidmurodova; B.Xayritdinov; F.Naimova

doi:10.5281/zenodo.7307536

ANALYSIS OF STUDY OF INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS OF THE COMPLETE GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAM

09.11.2022 International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series D. Volume 1 Issue 7

Z.Saidmurodova , B.Xayritdinov, F.Naimova

Abstract. One of the most important areas of reforming secondary general education, as noted in the Concept of the Federal Target Program for the Development of Education for 2016–2020, is the strengthening of its practical orientation. A practice-oriented approach involves the development of practical skills, the application of acquired knowledge in everyday life. This paper analyzes monitoring work carried out on the management in the field of education. The authors address the article to specialists of educational authorities, managers implementing profile education.

Keywords: education, management, approach, acquired knowledge, monitoring, organizations.

References:

1. Woolliscroft JO: Medical Student Clinical Education. International handbook of research in medical education. Edited by: Norman GR, Newble DI, van der Vleuten C. 2002, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 365-380. 2. Lauvås P, Handal G: Handledning och praktisk yrkesteori. (Eng title: Supervising and practical occupational theory). 2001, Lund: Studentlitteratur 3. Bandura A: Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 4. Skyvell Nilsson M, Knutsson A, Samuelsson B, Lönnroth P, Pilhammar Andersson E: Läkares erfarenhetsbaserade kunskap. Delrapport 1, Erfarenhetens professionella uttryck. (Eng title: Expression of professional experience). 2006, Göteborg: Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa, Sahlgrenska akademin vid Göteborgs universitet 5. Weissmann PF, Branch WT, Gracey CF, Haidet P, Frankel RM: Role modeling humanistic behavior: learning bedside manner from the experts. Academic Medicine. 2006, 81: 661-667. 10.1097/01.ACM.0000232423.81299.fe. 6. Wenestam C-G: Den inlärningspsykologiska grunden för didaktik. (Eng title: The foundation of learning psychology in Didaktik). Discussions on some educational issues VII, Research Report 175. Edited by: P K. 1997, Department of Teacher Education, Helsinki University, 85-124. 7. Ramsden P: Learning to teach in higher education. 2003, London: Routledge Falmer 8. Irby DM: Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine. 1995, 70: 898-931. 10.1097/00001888-199510000-00014. 9. Kilminster SM, Jolly BC: Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Medical Education. 2000, 34: 827-840. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00758.x. 10. Kernan WN, Hershman W, Alper EJ, Lee MY, Viscoli CM, Perry JR, O'Connor PG: Disagreement between students and preceptors regarding the value of teaching behaviors for ambulatory care settings. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2008, 20: 143-150. 10.1080/10401330801991667. 11. Kern DE, Branch WT, Jackson JL, Brady DW, Feldman MD, Levinson W, Lipkin M: Teaching the psychosocial aspects of care in the clinical setting: practical recommendations. Academic Medicine. 2005, 80: 8-20. 10.1097/00001888-200501000-00006. 12. Seabrook MA: Clinical students' initial reports of the educational climate in a single medical school. Medical Education. 2004, 38: 659-669. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01823.x. 13. Wahlqvist M, Skott A, Bjorkelund C, Dahlgren G, Lonka K, Mattsson B: Impact of medical students' descriptive evaluations on long-term course development. BMC Medical Education. 2006, 6: 24-10.1186/1472-6920-6-24. 14. Williams KN, Ramani S, Fraser B, Orlander JD: Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners. Academic Medicine. 2008, 83: 257-264. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637f3e. 15. Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R: What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Academic Medicine. 2008, 83: 452-466. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bee61. 16. Дьюи Дж. Демократия и образование / пер. с англ. М.: Педагогика, 2000. 383 с. 17. Брунер Дж. Психология познания: за пределами непосредственной информации / пер. с англ. К.И. Бабицкого. М.: Прогресс, 1977. 413 с. 18. Пойа Д. Математическое открытие. Решение задач: основные понятия, изучение и преподавание / пер. с англ. В.С. Бермана. М.: Наука, 1970. 452 с. 19. Дункер К. Структура и динамика процессов решения задач (о процессах решения практических проблем). Психология продуктивного (творческого) мышления / под ред. Ю.Б. Гиппенрейтер, В.В. Петухова. М.: МГУ, 1981. 268 с. 20. Проблемное обучение: прошлое, настоящее, будущее: кол. монография: в 3 кн. Кн. 1 / под ред. Е.В. Ковалевской. Нижневартовск: Изд-во Нижневарт. гума-нит. ун-та, 2010. 300 с. 21. Матюшкин А.М. Психология мышления. Мышление как разрешение проблемных ситуаций: учебное пособие. М.: Изд-во КДУ, 2009. 190 с. 22. Панина Е.Ю., Рубцова А.Д. Кейс-метод как способ обучения английскому языку в 6 классе // Проблемы романо-германской филологии, педагогики и методики преподавания иностранных языков. 2016. № 12. С. 222-227. 23. Гущин Ю.В. Интерактивные методы обучения в высшей школе // Психологический журнал. 2012. № 2. С. 1-18. 24. Гаранина Р.М., Гаранин А.А. Методические рекомендации по формированию медицинских кейсов: учеб.-метод. пособие. Самара: ООО «Издательство Ас-Гард», 2015. 61 с.