THE PHENOMENON OF AUXILIATION AS A PART OF GRAMMATICALIZATION IN THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

H.Yunusova

doi:10.5281/zenodo.7238494

THE PHENOMENON OF AUXILIATION AS A PART OF GRAMMATICALIZATION IN THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

22.10.2022 International Scientific Journal "Science and Innovation". Series B. Volume 1 Issue 7

H.Yunusova

Abstract. This article discusses the phenomenon of auxiliation, which is considered to be one type of grammaticalization where lexical words change their nature and demonstrate grammatical functions. Auxiliation appears as a universal phenomenon and analyzed both in English and Uzbek languages.

Keywords: auxiliation, grammaticalization, lexical functions, grammatical functions, auxiliary verbs, desemanticization, decategorialization, cliticization.

References:

1. Ellegård,A. The Auxiliary DO: the Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm,1953, p. 208 2. Givon, T. “Historical syntax and synchronic morphology’, Chicago Linguistic Society, Proceedings 7, 1971 p.396 3. Grashenkov, P.V. Development of TAM categories in Turkic: feeling free in the deterministic system // Selected papers from SinFonIJA3 / Maja Markovic, ed. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012, p.62. 4. Hae-Yun Lee, The Grammaticalization of Aspectual Auxiliary Verbs in Korean, International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, June 2015, pp.122-123 5. Hawkins, J. A. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 44 6. Hopper, P.J., Traugott, E. C. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 134 7. Hudson, R. The rise of auxiliary do: verb-non-raising or category-strengthening? Transactions of the Philological Society 95, 1997 p. 55 8. Johanson, L. Grammaticalization in Turkic languages. The Oxford book of grammaticalization. 2012, pp. 759-760 9. Khakimov, M. K. (2021). VISUAL POETIC TEXTS AS MULTISEMIOTIC SYSTEM. Theoretical & Applied Science, (8), 185-188. 10. Kizi, Y. H. R. (2021). Category of informativity in visual poetic texts. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(9), 389-393. 11. Kizi, Y. H. R., & Kizi, N. D. A. (2022). On the study of the structure of phraseological units with toponomies in the English and uzbek languages. 12. Krug, M. Auxiliaries and Grammaticalization. In: Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.) Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 550 13. Kuteva, T. Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, p.1 14. Lamiroy, B., Drobnjaković, A. Auxiliaries and Grammaticalization: A Case Study of Germanic and Slavonic Languages. Grammaticalization and Pragmatics: Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, 2009, p. 24 15. Newmeyer, F. J. “Deconstructing grammticalization”, Language Sciences 23.2-3 (special issue, Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment, ed. Lyle Campbell), 2001, p.193 16. Steele ,S. M. The category AUX as a language universal. In: J. Greenberg(ed.)1978a, p.42 17. Trudgill, P. (ed.). Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Arnold, 1978, p.78 18. Warner, A. English Auxiliaries. Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, p.82 19. Yunusova, H. R. Q. (2021). VIZUAL POETIK MATNLARDA GRAFIK BIRLIKLAR TAHLILI (HOZIRGI O ‘ZBEK SHE’RIYATI ASOSIDA). Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 1(7), 26-30. 20. Искандарова Ш. М. Луғавий бирликларнинг грамматикализация даражаси хусусида. Илмий хабарнома, АДУ, №4 2013 йил, 79 б 21. Шлуинский, А. «Бивербальные конструкции в тубаларском диалекте и их лексические ограничения» в сб. Тубаларские этюды, (ред.), Москва, 2009, стр.22 22. Юнусова, Х. (2022). Verbo-visual figures in poetic texts. Globallashuv davrida tilshunoslik va adabiyotshunoslik taraqqiyoti hamda ta’lim texnologiyalari, 1(1), 73-76.