17.09.2023 II International scientific and practical conference "Sustainable forestry"
1. Imran Q.M., Falak N., Hussan A., Man B - G., Yun B – W. 2021. Abiotic stress biotechnological tools in stress respontnce. J. Agronomy. 11(8), 15-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081579 2. Berger A., Boscari N.H., Rolin D., Puppo A., Brouquisse R. 2020. Plant nitrate reductases regulate fixing metabolism during the Medicago truncatula – Sinorhizobium multiloti simbiosis. Front. Plant Sci. 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls2020.01313 3. Kazemsouve M., Hatamian M., Tesfamaniam T. 2019. Plant dround stage influences heavy metal accumulation in leafy vegetables of garden cress and sweet basil. Chemical and biological technologies in Agriculture. 25(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-019-0170-3 4. Fu Z., Ciaris F., Feldman A.F., Gentine P., Makowski D., Colin Prentice I., Story P.C. 2022. Critical soil moisture thresholds of plants water stress in terrestrial ecosystem. Science advance J. 8(44), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq7827 5. Petruzelli G., Pedrom F. 2019. Influence of increasing tungsten concentrations and soil characteristics on plant uptace: gtanhouse experiments with Zea mays L. Appl. Sci. 9, 3998 https://doi.org/10.3390/app.9193998 6. Ahmed S., Ahmed S., Roy S.K., S.H.Woo, Sonawane D., Shohael A.M. 2022. Effect of salinity on the morphological, physiological and biochemical properties of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in Bangladesh. Open Agrriculture. 4, P.361 – 373. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0033 7. He M., He C – Q., Ding N – Z. 2018. Abiotic stresses: general defeaces for engineering multistress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci., 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls2018.0171 8. Norouzi O., Hesami M., Pepe M., Dutta A., Maxwell A., Jones P. 2022. In vitro plant tissue culture as the fifth generation of bioenergy. Scientific Reports. 12(5838), P.1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09066-3 9. Angulo-Bezarano P.I., Puente – Rivera J., Cruz – Orteza R. 2021. Metal and metalloid toxity in plants: an pverriev on molecular aspects. Planta. 10(4):635. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants/0040635 10. Slemi N., Kouki R., Ammar M.H., Ferrera R., Perez – Clemete R. 2021. Barium effecr on germinanation plant rowth and antioxidant enzymes in Cucumis sativus L. Food science and nutrition. 9(4), P.2086 – 2094. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2177 11. Sergeeva L., Bronnikova L. 2016. The proline – mediated reactuin of tobacco plants cultured under salinity. Lesia Ukrainka Eastern Europea National University Scientific Bulletin. Series: Biological Science. 12(336), P.15 – 19. https://doi.org/10.29038/2617-4723-2016-337-12-15-19 12. Kibria M.G., Hoque Md.A. 2019. A review on plant responses to soil salinity and amelioration srategies. Open Journal of soil science. 9(11), P.1 – 32. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2019.911013 13. Khoma Y.A., Nesterenko O.G., Kutsokon M.K., Khudolieieva L.V., Shevchenko V.V., Rasheydow N.N. 2021. Proline content in the leavels of poplar and willow under water deficit. Regulatory mechanisms in Biosystems. 12(3), P.519 – 522. https://doi.org/10.15421/022171 14. Hosseinifard M., Srefanian S., Javid M.G., Waztyla E., Garnezarska M. 2022. Contribution of exogenous prolie to aniotic stresses tolerance in plants: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(9), 5186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095186 15. Kibria M.G., Hoque Md.A. 2019. A review on plant responses to soil salinity and amelioration stategies. Open Journal of soil science. 9(11), P.1 – 32. https://doi.org/10.423/0jss.2019.911013 16. Paes de Meloi B., Avelar Carpinetti P., Fraga O.T., Fiores V.S., De Camargos :L.F., De Silva Ferreiro. 2022. Abiotic stress in plants and their marcers: a practice view of plant stress and programmed cell death mechanisms. J. Plant. 11(9), 1100. https://doi.org/3390/plants1191100 17. Sporman S., Nadais P., Sausa F., Pinto M., Martins M., Sausa B., Fidajgo F., Soures C. 2023. Accumulation of proline in plants under contaminated soil – are we on the same page? Antioxidants. 12(3), 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030666 18. Colin I., Ruhnow F., Zhu L – K., Zhao Y., Person S. 2023. The cell biology of primary cell watts during salt stress. The plant cell. 35(1), P.201 – 207. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcel/koa292 19. Aziz M.A., Sabeem M., Mullath S.K., Brini F., Masmodi K. 2021. Plant grop II LEA proteins: intrinsically discordered structure for multible function in response to environmental to stress. Biomolecules. 11, 1662, 27 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111662 20. Sergeeva L.E., Mykhalska S.I. 2019. Cell selection with heavy metal ions for obtaining salt tolerant plant cell cultures. Fiziology plants and genetic. 51(4), P.315 – 323. https://doi.org/10.15407/frh2019.04315 21. Khan J., Laboni A., Ajim T., Rlias S.M., Seraj V. 2023. Downregulation of the OsAKT1 K+/Na+ transporter by CRISPR – Cas9 mediated transformation in sensitive rise IR29 makes it tolerant to salt stress. Plant tissue Culture and Biotechnology. 33(1), P.71 – 84. https://doi.org/10.3329/pteb.v33i1.6668. 22. Asare M.O., Szakova J., Tlustoš P. 2023. The fate of secondary metabolites in plants growing on Cd-, As-, and Pb-contaminated soil – a comprehensive review. Environmental science and pollution research. 30, P.11378 – 11398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24776-x 23. Peng, J.; Tian, M.; Cantillo, N.M.; Zawodzinski, T. 2018. The ioiven water transport properties of K+ and Na+ form perfluorosulfonic acid polimer. Electrochimiro under leca Acta; 282, 544 – 554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.035 24. Sergeeva L.E., Bronnikova L.I. 2019. Cadmium ions in cell selection for obtaining wheat cell forms tolerant to water stress. Bulletin of the Cherkasy university, Series Biologycal Science. 2. P.74 – 80. https://doi.org/10.316551/2076-5835-2018-1-2019-2-74-80 25. Dragwidege J.M., Ford B.A., Ashnest J.R., Gendall A. 2018. Two endosomal NIIX – type Na+/H+ antiporter are involved in auxin – mediated development in Aabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiolog. 59(8), P.1660 – 1669. https://doi.org/10.1093/pep/pcy090 26. Norouzi O., Hesami M., Pepe M., Dutta A., Jones A.M.P. 2022. In vitro plant tissue culture as the fifth generation of bioenergy. Scientific Reports. 15, 50 p. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09066-3 27. Haider F.U., Liqun C., Coulter J.A., Cheema S.A., Wu J., Farooq M. 2021. Cadmium toxicity in plants: impacts and remediation. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 211(15), 111887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111887 28. Coleman L., Evans D., Kearns A. 2020. Plant cell culture. 208 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/97810 29. Labudda M., Dziurka K., Fidler J., Gietler M., Rybarczyk – Plońska A., Nykiel M., Prabucka B., Morkunas I., Muszyńska E. 2022. The alleviation of metal stress nuisance for plants – a review of promisimg solutions in the face os environmental challenges. – Plants. 11, 2544. https://doi.org/1033/plants11192544 30. Van Montagu M. 2020. The future of plant biotechnology in a globalized and environmentally endangered world. Genet. Mol. Biol. 43(2), P.1 – 11. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0040. 31. Xu X., Smaczniak C., Muino J., Kaufmann. 2021. Cell identity specification in plants: lessons from flower development. Journal of Experimental Botany. 72(12), P.4202 – 4217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab110 32. Carcia Grajeda B.A., Solo Acosta S.G., Guevara H.P., Diaz – Garcia M.E., Enriquez A.C., Campos – Gaxida J.J. 2017. Selective and colorimetric of Ba2+ ion aqueous solution using 11 – mercaptoundeling gold nanoparicles. RSC Advances. 7, 31611, P1 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra03861e 33. Lohani N., Sing M., Bhalla P. 2022. Biological parts for engineering abiotic stress tolerance stress in plants. Biodesing Research. 41 p. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9819314 34. Chen L., Liu J – R., Hu W – F., Gao J., Yan L – Y. 2021. Vanadium in soil plant system: sourse, fate, toxicity and bioremediation. Journal of hazardous materials. 405(5), 124200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazamat.2020.124200 35. Bapat V.A., Kavi Kishor P.B., Jalaja N., Jain S.M., Penna S. 2023. Plant cell cultures: biofactories for the production of bioactive compounds. Agronomy. 13(3), 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030858 36. Krasteva G., Georgiev V., Pavlov A. 2020. Recent application of plant cell cultute technology in cosmetics and foods. Engineering in life sciences. 21(3 -4), P.68 – 76. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202000078 37. Chen Z – H., Wang Y., Wang J – W., Babla M., Zhao C., Garcia – Mata C., Sani E., Differ C., Mak M., Hills A., Amtmann A., Blatt M.R. 2015. Nitrate reductase mutation alters potassium nutrition as wel as nitric oxide – mediated control of guard cell ion channel in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. 209(4), P.1456 – 1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.137114 38. Rosa E., Minard G., Lindholm J., Saasramoinen M. 2019. Moderate plant water stressmproves larval development, and impacts immunity and gut microbiota of a specialist herbivore. PLoS One. 14(2), P.1 – 22. https://doi.org/journal.pone.020492 39. Wang M., Hasegava T., Beier M., Hayashi M., Ohmori Y., Yano K., Teramoto S., Kamiya T., Fujiwara T. 2021. Growthand nitrate reductase activity are impared in rise Osnlp4 mutants supplied with nitrate. Plant and Cell Physiology. 62(7), 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061110 40. Kots S.Ya., Mykhalkiv L.M. 2019. Nitrate reductase and its role in legume – rhizobia symbiosis. Fiziology plants and genetic. Fiziology plants and genetic. 51(5), P.371 – 387. https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2019.05.371